Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an order was dismissed as not pressed by the learned counsel, who submitted the order had already been complied with.
Contempt petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cpst-8900-16.doc
rpa 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO.8900 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 329 OF 2016
Gaikwad S. Nanasaheb & Ors. .. Applicants V/s. Ujjval Uke & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. A. A. Gharte, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 5, 2016.
P.C. :
Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the order of which non-compliance has been alleged in Contempt Petition has already been complied with and as such on instructions he is not pressing the Contempt Petition. The Contempt Petition is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Gaikwad S. Nanasaheb & Ors.
Ujjval Uke & Ors.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
