This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 (22)pil-148-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.148 OF 2014
Sushant Subhash More V/s
The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Social Justice and ors
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
Ms.Leena Patil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.M.Pabale, AGP for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr.J.G.Reddy for respondent no.3.
CORAM: DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, CJ. & M.S. SONAK, J.
DATED: 7th DECEMBER, 2016
P.C.:-
1 The main prayers are against the third respondent in discharging his functions. Since third respondent has attained the age of superannuation, he cannot function to the displeasure of the petitioner any more.
2 In that view of the matter, nothing remains for consideration, and accordingly, petition is disposed of.
(M.S. SONAK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Tilak
Sushant Subhash More
The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Social Justice
The State of Maharashtra through ors
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
M.S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
