Contempt Petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear even when the matter was called out in the second session.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CP 171-15.doc-31
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.171 OF 2015
| Jagdish Daulat Mahale. | ] … Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Versus | |
| The State of Maharashtra, | ] |
| Through Mrs. Meera Borvankar. | ] … Respondents |
None for Petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for State.
CORAM :- SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATE :- DECEMBER 5, 2016
P. C. :-
None for the petitioner even when the matter is called out in the second session. Contempt Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
URS 1 of 1
Jagdish Daulat Mahale
The State of Maharashtra
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
