Maruti Vithoba Koli v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What did the court decide?
Leave granted to amend the Writ Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw446.16.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 446 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5088 OF 2015
Maruti Vithoba Koli ... Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Chintamani Bhangoji i/b. Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for the applicant.
Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for respondents 1 and 2. Mr. A.A. Joshi for respondent no.3.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ .
16th February, 2016 .
P.C.
Applicant has filed this application praying for allowing the applicant to amend the Writ Petition in view of the Schedule annexed to application as Exhibit 'D'. Leave is granted.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
Maruti Vithoba Koli
State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court