Minute rectified by substituting 'Village Level Bridge' for 'Taluka Level Bridge' in an order dated 17/2/2016. Motion for speaking to minutes disposed of with no substantive legal issue.
Substitution of 'Village Level Bridge' for 'Taluka Level Bridge' in a previous order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
pil-59-15
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 59 OF 2015
Shri Santosh Abhimanya Bhosale & anr.
.. Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. M. A. Patil for petitioners. Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP for respondent nos.1, 2, 4 and 5. Mr. Abhished Patwari i/by Mr. P. D. Paranape for respondent no.6. Mrs. Neha Bhide for respondent no.7.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & A. A. SAYED, JJ.
P.C.
In our order dated 17/2/2016, in paragraph no.1, the words “Taluka Level Bridge”, be substituted and read as “Village Level Bridge”.
Order dated 17/2/2016 stands corrected accordingly. Motion for speaking to minutes is disposed of.
(A. A. SAYED, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)
Shri Santosh Abhimanya Bhosale
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
A. A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
