Petitioner complained of non-promotion before retirement. Court found delay and held no interference under writ jurisdiction, though issues on merits remain open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2699.12.sxw
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2699 OF 2012
| Jadoram Chhoteram Sharma V/s. |
... | Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| State of Maharashtra & ors. | ... | Respondents |
Mr. Mahindra Deshmukh for the petitioner. Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for the State.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ .
16th February, 2016 .
P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
wp2699.12.sxw
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere in the promotion grievance of a retired teacher under writ jurisdiction
Jadoram Chhoteram Sharma
State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
