This Single Judge disposed of three connected Criminal Applications (No. 270 of 2015, 410 of 2015) as infructuous because the parent Writ Petition (No. 615 of 2014), which sought furlough, was decided on the same day. No substantive decision on the furlough request itself is recorded in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 12.crappw.61.15.270.15.410.15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 61 of 2015 WITH
CRI. APPLICATION NO. 270 OF 2015 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 410 OF 2015 IN
CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 615 OF 2014
Suraj Sarju Sarate .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Abhyakumar Apte Advocate appointed for Applicant Mr. A.S. Shitole A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : APRIL 20, 2016
P.C.:
1 The applicant has preferred Writ Petition No. 615 of
2014 wherein he has prayed for furlough. The prayer in all these applications is that the Writ Petition be decided expeditiously and he be released on furlough.
2 As the Writ Petition has been disposed of today by this Court, these applications are infructous and are disposed of as such.
[ SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]
kandarkar
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal applications pending before this Court should be disposed of after the related Writ Petition granting furlough was disposed of.
Suraj Sarju Sarate
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhu Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
