In this criminal application, the High Court of Bombay condoned the delay in filing under CRI. Appeal ST. No. 154 of 2016, holding that sufficient cause was made out and allowed the application in the terms of the application.
Delay is condoned; application is allowed in above terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 11.criappa.245.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 245 OF 2016 IN
CRI. APPEAL ST. NO. 154 OF 2016
Afzal Suleman Khan @ Parvesh @ Parmesh Guddu @ Pabhujyot Singh
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Rohan Sawant Advocate i/b Mr. Ashok Toraskar Advocate for Applicant
Mr. H.J. Dedia A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : APRIL 20, 2016
P.C.:
2 For the reasons stated in the application, we are of the opinion that sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay, hence, delay is condoned. Application is allowed in above terms.
[ SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]
kandarkar
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause for condonation of delay has been made out under the applicable provisions.
Afzal Suleman Khan
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
