Petitioner seeks leave to approach again if a grievance concerning a post is not redressed within time stipulated in a related court order.
Disposed of present PIL with similar directions and liberty to approach again within stipulated time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL 133.14
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.133/2014
MAJAHAR JAMIL PATEL
...PETITIONER...
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA.
...RESPONDENT...
.....
Shri R.D. Sanap, Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri P.P. More, AGP for Respondent.
.....
CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE: 16.12.2014
ORDER :
1]Learned counsel for petitioner states that grievance
of petitioner does not survive in view of directions of
this Court dated 2.12.2014 in Writ Petition
No.10748/2014. He, however, seeks leave to approach
again if the grievance is not redressed within time
stipulated in that order.
PIL 133.14
2]Hence, we dispose of present PIL with similar
directions and with liberty to petitioner to approach
again if the post is not filled in within time stipulated
therein. No order as to costs.
ndk/ c16121446.doc
MAJAHAR JAMIL PATEL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court