This PIL was disposed of based on identical order previously passed in Writ Petition No.4888/2014 dated 15.12.2014 by the same court, citing the same reasons and directions and directing no order as to costs.
Disposed of based on earlier order in W.P. No.4888/2014; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL 98.14
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.98/2014
PANDURANG HIMMAT PATIL
...PETITIONER...
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS.
...RESPONDENTS...
.....
Shri P.S. Shendurnikar, Advocate for Petitioner.
Smt. M.A. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 7.
Shri Kutty, Advocate h/f Shri C.R. Choudhari, Advocate
for Respondent No.8.
.....
CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE: 16.12.2014
ORDER :
The controversy is covered by orders passed on
15.12.2014 by this Court in Writ Petition No.4888/2014.
Accordingly, for the same reasons and with the same
directions, we dispose of present petition. No order as
to costs.
(A.M. BADAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
ndk/ c16121445.doc
PANDURANG HIMMAT PATIL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court