Kiran Raghunath Kamble and Anr. v. Chief Election Commission, through Chief Election Commissioner and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
pmw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw-1610.14
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1610 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4924 OF 2013
Kiran Raghunath Kamble and Anr. … Applicants
Vs.
Chief Election Commission, through Chief Election Commissioner and Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Sarnath Sariputta Pramod, for the Applicants. Ms. Shriya Jadhav i/by Mr. Sachindra B. Shetye, for the Respondent No.1.
Ms. Ashwini J. Kesare i/by Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure, for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP, for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATE : 10th JULY, 2014
P.C.
. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicants, the
learned counsel appearing for the first Respondent and the learned AGP
for the fourth Respondent. In view of the averments made in paragraph 4 of the application, a case is made out for restoration. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
(A. S. CHANDURKAR, J ) (A.S.OKA, J )
1 of 1
Kiran Raghunath Kamble
Chief Election Commission
A.S. OKA
A.S. CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court