High Court Bench at Aurangabad disposed of a Civil Revision Application hearing counsel submission that nothing survived in the matter based on a settlement.
The Civil Revision Application and Civil Application no.4777 of 2011 were disposed of without order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2008
Kashinathsingh S/o Gangusingh Rawat Petitioner
Versus
Bhaskar S/o Dattatraya Kottawar Respondent
Mr. K.C. Sant, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vivek Bhavthankar, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : M. T. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 22/10/2013
ORAL ORDER:
1. Heard.
2.Mr. Sant, learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions as well as on the basis of the certified copy
of the settlement pursis filed in the trial Court, marked
as "X" for the purpose of identification, submits that
nothing survives in the present Civil Revision
Application. In the circumstances, he submits that the
Civil Revision Application be disposed of.
3.Considering the submissions, the Civil Revision
Application is disposed of without any order as to costs.
Consequently, Civil Application no.4777 of 2011 also
stands disposed of.
arp/
Kashinathsingh S/o Gangusingh Rawat
Bhaskar S/o Dattatraya Kottawar
M. T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court