Applicant filed civil revision application. Court held dispute was res integra mandatorily owing to Full Bench ratio. Civil revision application dismissed without order as to costs.
Civil revision application dismissed without order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra3.05
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 03 OF 2005
Birla AT and T Communication Ltd. ...Applicant
versus
Rajkumar Poonamchand Jain and others ...Respondents
Mr. J.R. Shah, advocate for the applicant None for the respondents.
CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J. DATED : 21st OCTOBER, 2013
PER COURT :-
( M. T. JOSHI, J.)
rlj/
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Central Warehousing Corporation vs. Fortpoint Automotive Pvt. LimitedApplied¶12
_Central Warehousing Corporation vs. Fortpoint Automotive Pvt. Limited, reported in 2010 (1) Bom. C. R. 560_ · Who else cites this
Birla AT and T Communication Ltd.
Rajkumar Poonamchand Jain and others
M.T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
