The High Court allowed the petitioner's withdrawal of the contempt petition with liberty to rely on the material in subsequent trial court proceedings under Order 39 Rule 2 CPC. The accompanying civil applications were disposed of accordingly upon the main petition's withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp55.13
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 55 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8928 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9143 OF 2013
Jagannath Eknath Kande (Deceased through L.Rs.) Laxman Jagannath Kande
...Petitioner
versus
District Collector, Aurangabad and others
...Respondents
Mr. U.P. Giri with Mr. C.D. Biradar, advocate for the petitioner Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for respondent No. 1 Mr. P.V. Mandlik, senior counsel i/b Mr. S.K. Sawangikar, advocate for respondent No. 2 and 3
CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J. DATED : 21st OCTOBER, 2013
PER COURT :-
cp55.13
-2-
( M. T. JOSHI, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagannath Eknath Kande (Deceased through L.Rs.) Laxman Jagannath Kande
District Collector, Aurangabad
M.T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
