Sameeroddin Ajimoddin Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) CP. 482-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 482 OF 2013 IN P.I.L. NO. 34 OF 2013
Sameeroddin Ajimoddin Shaikh
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents
Mr. Ajinkya S. Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. V.H. Dighe, AGP for the respondent/State.
CORAM : M. T. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 22/10/2013
ORAL ORDER:
1. Heard.
2.There is no merit in the present Contempt
Petition. It is beyond the order passed by the
Division Bench in the Public Interest Litigation.
The Contempt Petition is dismissed.
[M. T. JOSHI, J.]
arp/
Sameeroddin Ajimoddin Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
M. T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court