Shriram Ramdas Jadhav v. Prabhakar Baburao Desele and Ors.
Bombay HCCP/179/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a contempt petition arising from a fresh appointment order without passing any order as to costs. No specific ruling on the rights of the parties was made.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
(1) CP. 179-2013
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
¶3
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 179 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 349 OF 2011
¶4
Shriram S/o Ramdas Jadhav Petitioner
¶5
Versus
¶6
Prabhakar Baburao Desele and others Respondents
¶7
Mr. R.J. Godbole, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Prashant Nagargoje, Advocate for the respondent no.2.
¶8
CORAM : M. T. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 22/10/2013
¶9
ORAL ORDER:
¶10
1. Heard.
¶11
2.Learned counsel for respondent no.2 files on
record copy of fresh appointment order issued on
1/3/2013, the same is marked as "X" for the purpose
of identification.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Shriram S/o Ramdas Jadhav
- respondent
Prabhakar Baburao Desele
Coram
AI extract
M. T. JOSHI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court