Shaikh Maheboob Shaikh Papamiya, C.No. 4340 Open Jail Paithan v. the State of Mah
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition disposed of as petitioner had already been released on 25th June 2011; no reliefs granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 35 OF 2012
| Office Notes, |
Off | ice | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memoranda of | Cora |
m, |
|
| appearances, orders or directio Registrar’s orders |
Cou ns |
rt’s and |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
| Mrs. V.A. Shinde, A.P.P. for State. | |||
| CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & T. V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATED : 2nd February, 2012. |
|||
| PER COURT : | |||
| 1. The learned A.P.P., on instructions, submits that | |||
| the petitioner Shaikh Maheboob Shaikh Papamiya has | |||
| already been released by order dated 25th June 2011. The communication in that respect is placed on record and marked as "X". |
|||
| 2. In view of the statement made by the learned A.P.P., the writ petition is disposed of. |
|||
| [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J.] ssc/ |
STATE
SHAIKH MAHEBOOB SHAIKH PAPAMIYA
NARESH H. PATIL
T. V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court