The High Court disposed of the civil application and vacated interim relief in a criminal matter, ruling that with the charge-sheet filed, the applicant could pursue alternate remedies, warranting no interference under section 482 CrPC.
Application disposed of; interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2926 OF 2008
( Subhash Narayanrao Joshi Vs. The State of Maharashtra)
| Office Notes, |
Off | ice | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memoranda of | Cora |
m, |
|
| appearances, orders or directio Registrar’s orders |
Cou ns a |
rt’s nd |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
| Mrs. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate for applicant. | |||
| CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & T. V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATED : 2nd February, 2012. |
|||
| PER COURT : | |||
| 1. Heard. | |||
| 2. The charge-sheet has been filed on 29th August 2008. In the light of the fact that charge-sheet has been filed, the applicant is entitled to resort to appropriate, |
|||
| alternate remedy as permissible in law. No interference is warranted in inherent jurisdiction conferred under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code. |
|||
| 3. The Civil Application is disposed of. Interim relief stands vacated. |
|||
| [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J.] ssc/ |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interference in inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CPC is warranted after filing of charge-sheet.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Subhash Narayanrao Joshi
The State of Maharashtra
Naresh H. Patil
T. V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
