High Court Bench at Aurangabad allowed Criminal Application No. 476 of 2012 arising out of Criminal Writ Petition No. 965 of 2011 by Smt. Asha Rasal, adhering to the prayer clause in the application.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (A).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra476.11
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.476 OF 2012
IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.965 OF 2011
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Smt. Asha Rasal Advocate for Applicant.
Shri. S.D. Kaldate, A.P.P. for Resp. Nos.
1 to 4.
Shri. Vinod Jadhav Advocate h/f. Shri.
V.D. Hon Advocate for Resp. No.5.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE : 1ST FEBRUARY, 2012.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing
for the Applicant.
2. For the reasons stated in the
Application, the Application is allowed
in terms of prayer clause (A).
[T.V. NALAWADE,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/JAN12
Smt. Asha Rasal
Resp. Nos. 1 to 4
Resp. No. 5
NARESH H. PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court