Disposed
The State of Mah v. Deshmukh Bandu Pawar
Bombay HCAPPLN/4468/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4468 OF 2011
| Office Notes, |
Off | ice | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memoranda of | Cora |
m, |
|
| appearances, orders or directio Registrar’s orders |
Cou ns a |
rt’s nd |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
| Mr. S.D. Kaldate, A.P.P. for applicant. | |||
| CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & T. V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATED : 2nd February, 2012. |
|||
| PER COURT : | |||
| 1. Heard the learned A.P.P. Perused the record and | |||
| proceedings. | |||
| 2.Admit. | |||
| 3. Action under section 390 of Criminal Procedure | |||
| Code be initiated. | |||
| 4. Record and proceedings be sent back. | |||
| [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J.] ssc/ |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
applicant
T. V. NALAWADE
NARESH H. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court