Disposed
Satish Sampath Anarase v. the State of Mah and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/67/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
WP No.67 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri. WP No.67 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Writ Petition No.67 of 2012
Satish Sampath Anarase. .. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. Shailesh S. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate, for petitioner. Shri. S.D. Kaldate, Additional Public Prosecutor, respondents.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE 1st FEBRUARY 2012
PER COURT :
2 Cri. WP No.67 of 2012
ultimately benefit the accused persons, who are chargesheeted. Some of the persons have not been arraigned as accused. Identification parade was not conducted. Ornaments are not seized and weapons are also not seized.
Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)
rsl
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satish Sampath Anarase
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court