Public Interest Litigation allowed to be withdrawn at the request of the petitioner before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
P.I.L. NO.40 OF 2011
Sanjay Bhila Patil ..PETITIONER VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors. ..RESPONDENTS
Mr N.B. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for respondent - State
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 7th March, 2012
PER COURT :
Allowed to be withdrawn at the request of the petitioner.
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
(B. R. GAVAI, J.)
amj/pil40.11
Sanjay Bhila Patil
The State of Mah.
Sunil P. Deshmukh
B. R. Gavai
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
