The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad rejected a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, finding no case for interference.
Petition stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1193 OF 2012
Sheshabai Vijay Patil ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors. ..RESPONDENTS
Mr S.M. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 to 3; Mr V.V. Bhavthankar, advocate for respondent no.4
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 7th March, 2012
PER COURT :
No case is made out for interference in the well reasoned order passed by the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Petition, therefore, stands rejected.
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.) (B. R. GAVAI, J.)
amj/wp1193.12
Sheshabai Vijay Patil
The State of Mah.
B. R. GAVAI
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
