This order directs Respondent No. 4 to decide the pending appeal filed by the petitioner on its merits within three weeks to serve the interest of justice, after which the writ petition stands disposed of.
Direction to Respondent No. 4 to decide the pending appeal within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2043 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
and the Registrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Coram: B. R. Gavai, and
Sunil P. Deshmukh, JJ.
Date: 7.3.2012
Shri R. P. Adgaonkar Adv. for Petitioner.
Shri K.M. Suryawanshi AGP, for Resp-State.
1.The petitioner has approached this court
being aggrieved by the orders of his
transfer.Hehasalreadyapproached
Respondent No.4, by way of an appeal.
2.We, therefore, find that the interest of
justice would be sub-served, if the appeal of
the petitioner is decided by Resp. No.4
early.
3.Accordingly, we direct Respondent No. 4
to decide the appeal filed by the present
petitioner on its own merits within three
2 weeks from today. 4. Petition stands disposed of, accordingly. (Sunil P. Deshmukh, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) pnd/wp-2043.12
The Petitioner
The State
Respondent No. 4
B. R. Gavai
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court