This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
PIL22.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.22 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.R. Ramamurthy i/b. Mr.A.P.Ranade for the petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for the resp./State.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 23, 2012.
P.C.:
Counsel for the petitioner states that the facts stated in the body of the PIL are not correct. Similarly, the prayers made in the PIL are also incorrect. In these circumstances, the learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the present PIL and prays that the issues and contentions raised in the PIL may be kept open. In view of the above facts, the PIL is allowed to be withdrawn by keeping the issues
1 of 2
krs
PIL22.12
and contentions raised in the PIL open.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
2 of 2
petitioner
state
d.d.sinha
v.k.tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
