Petitioner sought withdrawal of Public Interest Litigation No.48 of 2012 with liberty to file a fresh petition. Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the PIL accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the PIL with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 pil48.12.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Public Interest Litigation No.48 of 2012
Bahuudeshiya Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Uva Sastha Vs. The State of Mah. Department of Environment and Forest, Mantrayala, Mumbai-32, through its Secretary and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri S.D.Shukla, counsel for Petitioner. Shri S.S.Sanyal, counsel for R-3. Shri A.C.Dharmadhikar, counsel for R-5. Shri Nitin Sambre, GP for R-1.
CORAM : P. V. HARDAS & M. L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATE : 10th AUGUST, 2012.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw this PIL and prays for liberty of filing PIL afresh in accordance with the rules relating to the filing of the PIL.
We accordingly permit petitioner to withdraw this
PIL with the liberty as prayed for.
The PIL is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE
brw
...../-
bahuudeshiya Dr. babasaheb ambedkar uva sastha
the state of mah. department of environment and forest
P. V. hardas
M. L. tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
