High Court disposed of review petitions filed in Writ Petition No. 4631 of 2012, finding no case for indulgence.
Review Petition disposed of; Writ Petition remains as per original proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
rpw79.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW PETITION NO.79 OF 2012 In
WRIT PETITION NO.4631 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.N.S.Bhutekar i/b. Mr.Uday P. Warunjikar for the petitioners. Mr.T.J.Pandian for respondent no.1. Ms M.P.Thakur, A.G.P. for respondent no.2.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA &
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 23, 2012. P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the respective respondents and perused the impugned order dated 12.6.2012. No case is made out for showing indulgence. Review Petition is disposed of.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
1 of 1
Petitioners
Respondent 1
Respondent 2
D.D. Sinha
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
