Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) as the grievance did not fall within specific High Court rules. Single judge granted permission and disposed of the PIL as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the P.I.L. was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. (ST) NO. 14175 OF 2012
Jagdish Surjit Saini
.. Petitioner
Vs
The Returning Officer & Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. Vikram R. Chavan for the Petitioner
CORAM : D. D. SINHA &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 2nd AUGUST, 2012.
P.C.:
the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present P.I.L.
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ]
[ D. D. SINHA, J ]z
jfoanz vkacsjdj
Pg 1 of 1
Jagdish Surjit Saini
The Returning Officer & Ors.
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
