Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition to exhaust the alternative remedy of appeal. The court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to raise the same issues and contentions thereafter.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to raise issues and contentions open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-L-1780-12
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1780 OF 2012
Smt. Prajakta Prakash Narvekar versus State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Petitioner
..Respondents
Mr. J. S. Kini i/b. Mr. J. M. Puranik for Petitioner.
Mr. G. D. Utangale with Mr. B. A. Phadnis i/b. Utangale & Co. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 4.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
01 August 2012
P.C. :
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition in order to exhaust the alternate remedy of appeal provided under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 and prayed that the issues and contentions raised in the petition may kindly be kept open.
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Chandka
1/1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Prajakta Prakash Narvekar
State of Maharashtra
Ors.
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
