Civil application dismissed for want of prosecution at the proctor and registrar's office due to the absence of the applicants' counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA-1885-11
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1885 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10646 OF 2011
Bharat Shantaram Bhise & Ors.
..Applicants
versus
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
..Respondents
None for Applicants.
Mr. V. S. Gokhale - Assistant Government Pleader for State - Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
01 August 2012
P.C. :
Counsel for the applicants absent. Civil application dismissed for
want of prosecution.
(D. D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Chandka
1/1
D. D. SINHA
SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
