The petition claiming recovery of municipal funds was disposed of. The court directed the petitioner to approach the Divisional Commissioner before expressing no opinion on merits.
Petitioner directed to approach Divisional Commissioner with complete record; matter not pursued on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 75 OF 2012 BHARAT VITTHALRAO THITE VERSUS THE STATE AND ORS
Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Estling S Murge AGP for Respondents : Smt. A.V.Gondhalekar
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & S. B. DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated: August 06, 2012
PER COURT :-
( S. B. DESHMUKH, J. ) ( NARESH H. PATIL, J. )
akl
BHARAT VITTHALRAO THITE
THE STATE AND ORS
NARESH H. PATIL
S. B. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
