The PIL was called out for hearing. None of the petitioner appeared. The matter was dismissed for non-prosecution without any substantive decision or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
81.09.doc
1
SQP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.81 OF 2009
Ranjeetsingh Bharatsingh Pawra ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
None for Petitioner.
Mr.V.S.Gokhale, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED:- SEPTEMBER 27, 2012. P.C.
prosecution.
( SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
1/1
SQ Pathan
Ranjeetsingh Bharatsingh Pawra
State of Maharashtra
A.M.KHANWILKAR
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
