The High Court of Bombay disposed of Public Interest Litigation No.79 of 2011 as infructuous. The bench observed that the petition became fruitsless due to orders passed by the concerned Court in Russia on the controversy.
The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ASN
PIL-79.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION LODGING NO.79 OF 2011
Dr.Vijay I.Dave and anr. ...Petitioners. Vs.
Unionof India and ors. ...Respondents.
Mr.A.M.Sethana with Triveni Jani i/by Shetty, Sethana & Associates for the petitioners.
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Ms.Anamika Malhotra for the Respondents.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C. J. AND
SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.
DATE : 09 JANUARY 2012
PC:
Learned counsel for the parties agreed that in view of the orders passed by the concerned Court in Russia on the controversy in question, this petition has now become infructuous.
2 In view of the above statement, we dispose of this petition as infructuous.
CHIEF JUSTICE
( SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. )
Dr. Vijay I. Dave
Union of India
MOHIT S. SHAH
SMT. ROSHAN DALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
