This order allows a chamber summons in a writ petition and directs the inclusion of certain applicants as respondents. The text is an operative order disposing of a technical procedural matter without substantive legal discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 3 OF 2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 643 OF 2005
Solomon Mordecai ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharasthra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for petitioner.
Ms. Geeta Joglekar for respondent no. 2.
Mr. J.S. Saluja, A.G.P. for respondent no. 1.
Mr. A.L. Patki for respondent no. 3.
Mr. R.V. Govilkar with Smt. Sadhana Mahashabde for applicants/intervenors. Mr. N.R. Prajapati for respondent Union of India.
CORAM : MOHIT SHAH, C.J. AND SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : JANUARY 10, 2012
P.C.
Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for parties in Writ Petition No. 643 of 2005, we allow this Chamber summons in terms of prayer clause (a) and direct the writ petitioners to joint 11 applicants as respondent nos. 5 to 21 in Writ Petition No. 643 of 2005.
The amendment to be carried out within one week from today.
CHIEF JUSTICE
(SMT.ROSHAN DALVI,J.)
Solomon Mordecai
State of Maharasthra
Mohit Shah
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
