This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sk
1
PILST28585.11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (STAMP) NO.28585 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.D.Deshmukh for the petitioner. Mr.A.B.Vagyani, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for resp. nos.2 to 4.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 06, 2012.
P.C.:
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the PIL with liberty to approach the competent authority of Ambernath Municipal Council for redressal of his grievance within three weeks and prays that the issues raised in the petition be kept open. In the circumstances, the PIL is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Petitioner
Respondents 2 to 4
D. D. Sinha
Smt. V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
