Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition to avail an alternative remedy. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with liberty to seek other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO.2628 OF 2010
Ramesh Chandrabhan Gabda, Prop. of Shakti Radio & Electric Services
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The District Magistrate, Dhule & anr.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr A.S. Deshpande, Advocate holding for Mr S.V. Advant for the petitioner; Mr S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for respondent no.1.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ.
DATE : 9th April, 2010
PER COURT :
After arguing for some time the learned Advocate Shri A.S. Deshpande on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition so as to avail other remedy, if permissible in law. The petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. No order as to costs.
( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) ( P. V. HARDAS, J. )
amj/wp2628.10
Ramesh Chandrabhan Gabda
The District Magistrate, Dhule
P. V. Hardas
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
