State of Maha and Ors. v. Chandrabhan Govindrao Patil
Case brief
What is this about?
A civil application was dismissed as the applicant did not press for the relief prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4022 OF 2004 IN W.P.NO. 4346/1999.
The State of Maharashtra
and another
... Applicants.
Versus
Chandrabhan Govindrao Patil... Respondent.
Mr.K.G.Patil, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the
applicant.
Mr.A.S.Deshpande, advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND
: S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ.
Date : 08.04.2010.
PER COURT
1.Learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader states on
instructions that the applicant does not press
for the relief prayed for in this Civil
2
Application. Consequently, Civil Application is
dismissed as not pressed.
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)(P.V.HARDAS,J.)
asp/office/Ca4022.04
The State of Maharashtra
Chandrabhan Govindrao Patil
P.V.HARDAS
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court