The High Court of Bombay allowed the civil application seeking issue of fresh notice to respondents and directed service by handpost.
Fresh notice issued to unserved respondents, returnable in six weeks; service by handpost allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4948 OF 2010 IN W.P.NO. 5091/2009.
Suryakant S/o Murlidhar Kamble ... Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others
... Respondents.
Mr.N.B.Suryawanshi, advocate for the applicant.
Mr.K.J.Ghute Patil, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for
Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND
: S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ.
Date : 08.04.2010.
PER COURT
1.By this application, the applicant
seeks issuance of fresh notice to Respondents.
The Civil Application is allowed and accordingly
fresh notice be issued to the unserved
2
Respondents returnable in six (6) weeks.
2. Service by Hamdast allowed.
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)(P.V.HARDAS,J.)
asp/office/Ca4948.10
Suryakant S/o Murlidhar Kamble
The State of Maharashtra
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
P.V.HARDAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court