This court allowed a civil application seeking recall of an earlier order that dismissed a writ petition for the default of appearance of the petitioner's counsel, restoring the petition to file.
Order dated 5.3.2010 dismissed for default of appearance is recalled and the petition is restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4596 OF 2010 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.8272 OF 2009
Prakash Narayandas Rizwani, Age : 37 yrs., Occu. Business, R/o 37, Bhagyanagar, Nanded ..APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Ms Netrali Jain, Advocate for the applicant; Mr S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for respondents.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S. V. GANGAPURWALA,JJ. DATE : 9th April, 2010
PER COURT :
By this application the applicant seeks recall of the order of this Court dated 5.3.2010 dismissing the petition for default of appearance of the Counsel for the petitioner. We have heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.P. for respondents and for the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed and order of this Court dated 5.3.2010 is recalled and the petition is restored to file.
(S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J. )
amj/ca4596.10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dismissing the petition for default of appearance of counsel should be recalled and the petition restored to file?
Prakash Narayandas Rizwani
The State of Mah. & ors.
P.V. Hardas
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
