The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the withdrawal of a public interest litigation to enable the filing of a fresh petition and disposed of the matter accordingly.
PIL disposed of on withdrawal with permission to file fresh comprehensive petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 160 OF 2009
Nagrik Chetna Manch and another. Versus
Pune Municipal Corporation, Pune and others.
... Petitioners
... Respondents
Mr.Manoj Wadekar i/by M/s. Manoj Wadekar and Associates for the petitioners.
CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, CHIEF JUSTICE & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATED : 18TH FEBRUARY, 2010
P.C.
The learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of this
PIL so as to enable the petitioners to file a fresh comprehensive petition.
Permission granted. PIL stands disposed of as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Nagrik Chetna Manch
Pune Municipal Corporation, Pune
Anil R. Dave
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
