These appeals against orders in arbitration petitions are disposed of as infructuous because the underlying machinery has already been disposed of, without going into merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L) NO. 538 OF 2009 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 376 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3250 OF 2009
WITH
APPEAL (L) NO. 539 OF 2009 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 375 OF 2009 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3248 OF 2009
WITH
APPEAL (L) NO. 540 OF 2009 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 374 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3249 OF 2009
WITH
APPEAL (L) NO. 541 OF 2009 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 373 OF 2009 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3247 OF 2009
Ropa Plastics Pvt. Ltd. V/s. L and T Finance Ltd.
... Appellants.
... Respondents.
Mr. S.B. Deshmukh for the Appellant. Ms. S.I. Joshi i/b. M/s. S.I. Joshi & Co. for the Respondents.
2
CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATED : 17th FEBRUARY, 2010.
P.C. :-
Without going into merits of the case, we note the fact that the machinery in question have already been disposed of. In such circumstances, these Appeals have become infructuous and are accordingly disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Ropa Plastics Pvt. Ltd.
L and T Finance Ltd.
Anil R. Dave
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
