This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rng
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION P.I.L.NO.91 OF 2007
Manmohan P.Khanvilkar .. Petitioner
Vs.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & 4 ors .. Respondents
Mr.Kunal Cheema for Petitioner Mr.K.K.Singhvi, Sr.Advocate a/w Ms.Shobha Ajeet Kumar for Respondent no.1 Mr.Milind More, AGP for Respondent no.3 Mr.A.C.Singh i/b Mr.D.R.Shah for Respondent no.4
CORAM : J.N.PATEL AND SMT V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ DATED : 11th February, 2009
P.C.
2004 (4) BCR page 1 (H.L.Gokhale and R.S.Mohite,
JJ)
to entertain this PIL.
Petition is disposed of accordingly.
{ Smt V.K.Tahilramani, J } { J.N.Patel, J }
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dr. Rajendra Thacker vs. MCGB & orsReferred¶9
Dr.Rajendra Thacker vs MCGB & ors reported in 2004 (4) BCR page 1 (H.L.Gokhale and R.S.Mohite, JJ)
Manmohan P.Khanvilkar
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
4 ors
J.N.Patel
V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
