Dismissed
Tanaji Maruti Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/22/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.22 OF 2009
Tanaji Maruti Jadhav Vs.
...Petitioner
State of Maharashtra and others
... Respondents
Mr. Chetan G. Patil for the petitioner.
Mr. P.M. Patil, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE : 12TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the respondent states
that the competent authority shall examine the averments made in
this writ petition and would take appropriate decision in accordance
with law expeditiously. In view of the statement made, nothing
survives in this petition and the same is disposed of. Respondent will abide by the statement.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Tanaji Maruti Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court