The High Court, Mumbai, dismissed the petitioner's notice of motion as infructuous because the High Power Committee had already taken a decision regarding the application.
Notice of motion dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.209 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.147 OF 2007
Johanna Luke Amanna .. Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.M.D.Naik, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 12
Mr.G.D.Utangale for respondent nos.2 to 6
Mr.S.D.Mishra for respondent nos.9 and 10
Ms.S.M.Mondle for respondent nos.13 to 15
CORAM: J.N. PATEL, &
Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE: 10TH FEBRUARY, 2009
P.C.
1. None for the petitioner.
2. The prayer of the petitioner is that the High
Power Committee constituted by the respondent be
directed to fix up the date for hearing of the
application filed by the petitioner.
2
3. The learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for
respondent nos.2 to 6 state that the High Power
Committee has already taken a decision in the matter.
In this view of the matter, notice of motion is
dismissed as infructuous.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
(Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.)
Johanna Luke Amanna
The State of Maharashtra
J.N. PATEL
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court