Disposed
Investors Grievances Forum and 3 Ors. v. Union of India and 17 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/4/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION WP NO. 4 OF 2009
Investors Grievances Forum & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
Shri Rajiv Kumar i/by M/s. Dhruve Liladhar & Co. for the Petitioners. Shri D.A. Nalawade, GP for Respondent Nos.2 and 6. Shri J.J. Bhatt with Daya Gupta for Respondent No.3. Shri Vikram Trivedi i/by M.K. Ambalal for Respondent No.4. Ms Soumya Srikrishna i/by Kanga & Co. for Respondent No.5. Shri Arun Siwach i/by A.M. And S.A. Shroff for Respondent No.7. S/Shri Janak Dwarkadas, Navroz Seervai, Farhad Sorabjee, Zerick Dastur, Sikham Singh and Khursheet Vajifdar for Respondent No.17.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J DATED : 12TH FEBRUARY, 2009.
P.C.
Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners wishes to
withdraw the Petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same
cause of action giving precise facts and claiming limited reliefs. The
Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
2
J
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,
Investors Grievances Forum and Others
Union of India and Others
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court