In PIL No.36 of 2007, the High Court of Bombay at Bombay dismissed the petition for want of appearance as no one was present on behalf of the petitioners on the date of hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.36 OF 2007
Janhit Manch & Ors.
.. Petitioner s
Vs
Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
None present for the parties.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J DATED : 5TH FEBRUARY, 2009.
P.C.
Nobody is present on behalf of the Petitioners. On 4th
December, 2008 also, nobody was present on behalf of the
Petitioenrs. The Petition is dismissed for want of appearance.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,
J
Janhit Manch & Ors.
Union of India & Ors.
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
