In PIL WP No.89 of 2009, the Bombay High Court accepted the petitioner's praecipe for withdrawal of the writ petition, dismissed it as withdrawn, and directed the removal of office objections within one week.
Praecipe for withdrawal accepted; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PIL WRIT PETITION NO.89 OF 2009
Prakash Laxman Chanderkar.
..Petitioner.
v/s.
The Union of India .
..Respondent.
None for Petitioner.
CORAM:- SWATANTER KUMAR,CJ. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
DATED :- OCTOBER 14, 2009.
P.C.
is accepted. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
any, within one week from today.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
Prakash Laxman Chanderkar
The Union of India
SWATANTER KUMAR
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
