On an application by counsel to call a fresh internal representation regarding the petitioner's examination matter, the court found the writ petition surplus to requirements and disposed of it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 927 OF 2009
Dhimant Pritisen Goragandhi ).. Petitioner
Versus
University of Mumbai ).. Respondent
Mr. Shardul Singh i/b Ms.Sushma Singh for the Petitioner. Mr. B.V. Phadnis for the Respondent.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 12TH OCTOBER 2009
P.C .
The learned Counsel appearing for the parties submit that the Petitioner may make a fresh representation to the Board of Examination which then will be decided by the Board and the competent authority in accordance with law and expeditiously.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Dhimant Pritisen Goragandhi
University of Mumbai
Swatanter Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
