This interlocutory civil PIL petition arising under the BMC Act was disposed of, as the Corporation promised to examine the petitioner's grievance regarding a respondent's disqualification within ten weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.88 OF 2009
Shri.Narendra Chandulal Naik ...Petitioner
Versus
Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.A.V.Anturkar i/b Mr.S.B.Deshmukh for Petitioner.
Mr.K.K.Singhvi, Sr.Counsel with Mrs.V.S.Gharapure for Corporation.
...... CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : OCTOBER 15, 2009.
P.C. :
No.4 has earned a disqualification under Section 16 of the Act on representation made by the Petitioner. Such representation be filed within two weeks from today.
: 2 :
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
(Correction carried out in terms of order dated 12/11/2009)
Narendra Chandulal Naik
Mumbai Municipal Corporation
Swatanter Kumar
A.M.Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
