The court disposed of a Pending Public Interest Litigation as infructuous because the respondent State authorities had taken cognizance and remedial measures, rendering further litigation useless.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION SUO MOTU NO.153 OF 2004
The Chairman, Society for People’s Development, Solapur .. Petitioner Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Amit Sale for the petitioner
Mr.V.A. Sonpal, A.G.P. for respondent no.1 to 3 and 5
CORAM : J. N. PATEL &
Smt.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ
DATE : 7TH OCTOBER, 2009
P.C. :
2
infructuous.
( J. N. Patel, J)
(Smt.R.P.Sondurbaldota, J)
The Chairman, Society for People's Development, Solapur
The State of Maharashtra
J. N. Patel
Smt. R. P. Sondurbaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
